Publique un comentario ChatGPT e inteligencia artificial, señal de alerta para el proceso editorial de revistas médicas
Texto completo:
PDFResumen
ChatGPT e inteligencia artificial, señal de alerta para el proceso editorial de revistas médicas
Referencias
Stokel-Walker C. AI bot ChatGPT writes smart essays-should professors worry? Nature. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-04397-7 PMID: 36494443.
Else H. Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature. 2023 [acceso 01/03/2023];613(7944):423. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00056-7
King MR. A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence, Chatbots, and Plagiarism in Higher Education. Cellular and molecular bioengineering. 2023 [acceso 02/04/2023];16(1):1-2. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8
D'Amico RS, White TG, Shah HA, Langer DJ. I Asked a ChatGPT to Write an Editorial About How We Can Incorporate Chatbots Into Neurosurgical Research and Patient Care. Neurosurgery. 2023;92(4):663-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002414
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use. Nature. 2023;613(7945):612. DOI: https://doi.org/doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00191-1
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, Sillos C, De Leon L, Elepaño C, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-Assisted Medical Education Using Large Language Models. medRxiv. 2022 [acceso 01/04/2023];1-25. Disponible en: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.19.22283643v2
Blanco-González A, Cabezon A, Seco-González A, Conde-Torres D, Antelo-Riveiro P, Piñeiro A, et al. The Role of AI in Drug Discovery: Challenges, Opportunities, and Strategies. Pharmaceuticals. 2023 [acceso 02/01/2023];16(6),891. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/16/6/891
Zhavoronkov A. Rapamycin in the context of Pascal's Wager: generative pre-trained transformer perspective. Oncoscience. 2022 [acceso 21/03 /2023];9:82-4. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9796173/
Gao CA, Howard FM, Markov NS, Dyer EC, Ramesh S, Luo Y, et al. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to original abstracts using an artificial intelligence output detector, plagiarism detector, and blinded human reviewers. bioRxiv. 2022;1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.521610
Hosseini M, Rasmussen LM, Resnik DB. Using AI to write scholarly publications. Accountability in research. 2023 [acceso 03/04 /2023]:1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535
Stokel-Walker C. ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove. Nature. 2023 [acceso 10/04 /2023];613(7945):620-1. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36653617/
Yeo-Teh NSL, Tang BL. Letter to Editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria. Accountability in research. 2023 [acceso 01/04/2023];1-3. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36748354/
Copyright (c) 2023 Junior Vega Jiménez, Leandro L. Lorente Leyva, Alberto Medina Leon
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.
